Wreck Tour 53: Segontium

Segontium
Segontium

This mussel-dredger lying off Anglesey makes an appealing prospect for an all-levels club outing, says JOHN LIDDIARD. Illustration by MAX ELLIS

FOR OUR FIRST-EVER NORTH WALES WRECK TOUR, I have picked a splendid little wreck that just about anyone can enjoy. The mussel-dredger Segontium met her fate on the way to the scrapyard in 1984.

When I dived the Segontium last year, skipper Scott Waterman had dropped a shot across the stern and it ran right past the side of the funnel (1), so that is where our tour will begin.

Having been down for only 20 years or so, the Segontium is amazingly intact. The funnel stands upright from the superstructure, with a pair of ventilators right behind it.

and doorway and shaft down to the engine-room
Doorway and shaft down to the engine-room

I enjoyed quite good visibility but, should you be less fortunate, this provides an easy clue as to which way is forward and which side is which.

Dropping to deck level at 26m on the port side, the railing (2) is intact and draped with several layers of trawl-net. Staying clear of the netting and heading aft, at the stern the otherwise clear deck is broken by a forest of ventilators (3) of different shapes and sizes.

On a smaller scale they could easily be used as a desk-tidy. Everything is smothered in anemones, even the deck.

The side of the wreck is now clear of nets, making it safe to drop over the side and deeper to have a look at the stern. The seabed is a dark silty sand, slightly scoured to 31m below the square rudder (4).

Between the rudder and the hull, the propeller is shrouded in a heavy steel guard, with more trawl-net pulled tight under it (5). It’s ironic that a guard designed to keep nets and ropes clear of the propeller when the Segontium was working has now trapped another fishing vessel’s nets.

Ascending the starboard side of the stern, there are no nets and it is safe to venture a little further forward to meet the deck near a small pair of mooring bollards (6).

Having got the deep part of the dive out of the way, now is the time for a leisurely inspection of the superstructure. Behind the funnel and ventilator stacks, the engine-room ventilation-hatches are open (7), though on a ship of this size they are far too small to swim through. Nevertheless, shining a strong light inside may reveal a glimpse of the engine.

By the starboard railing, a grating above the deck marks the point at which a lifeboat would have been stored (8). The railing here has a gap that looks intentional rather than damage subsequent to sinking.

steps to the bow deck and porthole in the rear wall of the wheelhouse
Steps to the bow deck and porthole in the rear wall of the wheelhouse

Forward of the funnel, an open doorway (9) marks a shaft and ladder down to the engine-room. Again, it’s very tight for a diver, and all but the most suicidal of hole-fiends will again have to be content with shining a torch down to see which bits of machinery they can glimpse.

The aft part of the wheelhouse is steel, but the forward section must have been wooden because it has rotted completely away, making it easy to swim around what would have been the inside (10).

To either side of the wheelhouse, steps lead down to the main deck at 28m. Bearing in mind that all the nets are on the port side, I would recommend that you stick to starboard.

On the main deck, the hold-covers have partly caved in to give a shallow valley along the centre of the deck. Almost immediately, a pair of square hold-hatches (11) provide a view into the hold and a way in for those so inclined.

Next on the starboard side comes a small hoist (12). There is no corresponding hoist on the port side; like most fishing vessels, the Segontium would have been set up to work over only one of its sides.

Further forward, a square frame stands from the deck (13), followed by a small winch and another hatchway down to the hold below (14), again showing the one-sided working of the ship.

The mast (15) has a pair of beams angled against it, originally used to lay the mussel-dredging equipment over the side, although this gear was removed from the Segontium before it left on its final journey.

Steps lead up to the bow deck, the port side again obstructed by nets and the starboard side clear. It is a small bow deck with barely enough room for the anchor-winch (16).

Depending on how happy you are about putting a dip at the end of an otherwise quite restrained dive-profile, on the starboard bow close to the seabed there is a dinner-plate-sized hole partly obscured by enormous plumose anemones (17).

Rounding the bow, on the port side and slightly higher, there is a considerable dent (18). Could the Segontium have hit something on its final voyage? Or could this have been old damage, or perhaps caused by one of the many trawlers that seem to have lost their nets on this wreck?

This is a fairly small wreck, so there is plenty of time to see it all at a relaxed pace, with little if any decompression penalty. From the bow, a nice ascent route is to follow the mast upwards, popping a delayed SMB from the top at 18m (19).

She wouldn’t go quietly

“She was a dodgy boat. Her stability was suspect but then, she was designed by engineers so what can you expect?” Captain Raymond Phillips, who had been one of the Segontium’s captains, was talking to me about the vessel, writes Kendall McDonald.

He sounded not the slightest bit upset, and indeed was exceptionally cheerful when I told him that amateur divers often visit his former command as it lies up right on the bottom of Caernarvon Bay

I have rarely had so much trouble in tracing a wreck’s history as I did with the Segontium. This trouble was largely caused by someone ill-informed putting on a website: “quote ”Segondium [sic] did not sink in Caernarvon Bay, after a spell in the Caernarvon Maritime Museum she was scrapped.”

This statement hid her true story for some time. Even though the Caernarvan Maritime Museum curator said it was rubbish, and that the museum had never had the vessel, the tale sent me careering around in Welsh trawling circles.

Guildhall Museum in London as usual turned out to be the shipwreck researcher’s best friend, and dug out details of the Segontium from its vast Lloyd’s marine collection.

The vessel was built for the Navy at Faversham in Kent and launched into the Swale in 1943. It was designed for use as armament stores tender C165 and spent its war supplying shells and other ammunition to big warships and convoy escorts.

At the end of the war, C165 was converted. It appears on the Merchant Navy list of 1976 as a 192-ton British steel motor vessel with fishing-trawler classification and its port of registry London. It was later owned by Welsh Seafoods of Bangor, Caernarvonshire.

This information sent me back to Wales and it wasn’t long before I found Captain Phillips. He told me that well before he took command the boat was named Segontium after an ancient Roman fort in Caernarvon.

Later it was again converted, this time into a mussel-dredger. “It wasn’t a very popular kind of fishing because she was equipped to hoover up the mussels by using a water dredge,” said the captain.

How did the 20m dredger finally sink? Captain Phillips was not onboard for its last voyage in 1984, which was with a scratch crew taking it to be scrapped. “She foundered in rough weather,” he said. ”Water just came in and that was that.” All onboard were saved.

GETTING THERE: Follow the A55 across North Wales to Anglesey. Once over the bridge, take the slip-road and turn right to Menai Bridge (the town, not the bridge itself). Turn towards the waterfront by the newsagent and post office opposite the HSBC. The boat picks up from the pontoon in front of the harbour office.

DIVING AND AIR: Scott Waterman, Quest Diving Charters.

ACCOMMODATION: Quest can put you in contact with the whole range of local accommodation, ranging from B&B in the pub by the harbour office to camping outside town.

TIDES: Slack water occurs 90 minutes before high water and low water Liverpool. On a neap tide, slack can last as long as two hours.

HOW TO FIND IT: Scott Waterman advises that the position given in his book is a mistake. The actual GPS position is 53 05.936N, 004 33.231W.

QUALIFICATIONS: Suitable for any sport diver, at a depth well suited to making the most of nitrox.

FURTHER INFORMATION: Admiralty Chart 1970, Caernarvon Bay. Ordnance Survey Map 114, Anglesey. Anglesey Wrecks & Reefs, Andy Shears and Scott Waterman. Anglesey tourist information.

PROS: Ideal for the average club dive, where everyone can have a decent time on the wreck and see it all without getting into too much decompression.

CONS: Stay clear of the port side, which is heavily draped with nets.

Thanks to Scott Waterman

Appeared in Diver, July 2003

Should I Change My Regulator Hoses Every 5 Years? #askmark #scuba 
@jeffmoye
Do Miflex hoses need to be replaced regularly? One service tech I spoke to said they need to be replaced every 5 yrs. can’t find anything on their website or brochure about it so I wonder if it’s obsolete news related to the rubber failure issue they used to have?
#scuba #scubadiving #scubadiver
LINKS

Become a fan: https://www.scubadivermag.com/join
Gear Purchases: https://www.scubadivermag.com/affiliate/dive-gear 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OUR WEBSITES

Website: https://www.scubadivermag.com ➡️ Scuba Diving, Underwater Photography, Hints & Advice, Scuba Gear Reviews
Website: https://www.divernet.com ➡️ Scuba News, Underwater Photography, Hints & Advice, Travel Reports
Website: https://www.godivingshow.com ➡️ The Only Dive Show in the United Kingdom
Website: https://www.rorkmedia.com ➡️ For advertising within our brands
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA

FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/scubadivermag
TWITTER: https://twitter.com/scubadivermag
INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/scubadivermagazine

We partner with https://www.scuba.com and https://www.mikesdivestore.com for all your gear essentials. Consider using the affiliate link above to support the channel.
00:00 Introduction
00:43 Question
01:04 Answer

Should I Change My Regulator Hoses Every 5 Years? #askmark #scuba
@jeffmoye
Do Miflex hoses need to be replaced regularly? One service tech I spoke to said they need to be replaced every 5 yrs. can’t find anything on their website or brochure about it so I wonder if it’s obsolete news related to the rubber failure issue they used to have?
#scuba #scubadiving #scubadiver
LINKS

Become a fan: https://www.scubadivermag.com/join
Gear Purchases: https://www.scubadivermag.com/affiliate/dive-gear
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OUR WEBSITES

Website: https://www.scubadivermag.com ➡️ Scuba Diving, Underwater Photography, Hints & Advice, Scuba Gear Reviews
Website: https://www.divernet.com ➡️ Scuba News, Underwater Photography, Hints & Advice, Travel Reports
Website: https://www.godivingshow.com ➡️ The Only Dive Show in the United Kingdom
Website: https://www.rorkmedia.com ➡️ For advertising within our brands
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA

FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/scubadivermag
TWITTER: https://twitter.com/scubadivermag
INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/scubadivermagazine

We partner with https://www.scuba.com and https://www.mikesdivestore.com for all your gear essentials. Consider using the affiliate link above to support the channel.
00:00 Introduction
00:43 Question
01:04 Answer

YouTube Video UEw2X2VCMS1KYWdWbXFQSGV1YW84WVRHb2pFNkl3WlRSZS41ODJDREU4NjNDRTM2QkNC

Should I Change My Regulator Hoses Every 5 Years? #askmark #scuba

LET’S KEEP IN TOUCH!

Get a weekly roundup of all Divernet news and articles Scuba Mask
We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Connect With Us

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x